Subject: Opposition to the Acquisition of a U.S. Steel Company by Nippon Steel Corporation

To whom it may concern in treasury.gov,

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed acquisition of a U.S. steel company by Nippon Steel Corporation. This transaction, if approved, has the potential to harm the United States’ national security, industrial independence, and economic interests. I urge the U.S. government to carefully evaluate the implications of this acquisition and to ultimately deny the application for the reasons outlined below.

Reason #1: Insufficient Protection of Foreign Taxpayer Interests

Based on my experience and observations, there are notable instances where the Japanese government has failed to fully protect and support the interests of foreign taxpayers and subsidiaries when conflicts arise between foreign and domestic subsidiaries of Japanese corporations. In such situations, the Japanese government’s policies and priorities tend to favor the interests of domestic entities over foreign-owned entities.

This potential conflict of interest could have adverse effects on the U.S. subsidiary’s operations, employees, and stakeholders after the acquisition. The U.S. steel company may find itself at a disadvantage in decision-making processes, resource allocation, and strategic priorities as the Japanese parent company prioritizes its domestic operations and objectives. This could result in diminished competitiveness and operational inefficiencies for the U.S. subsidiary, ultimately harming American workers and the broader industry.

Reason #2: Threats to U.S. National Security and Industrial Independence

Steel is a critical industry for the United States, serving as the backbone of our infrastructure, defense, and manufacturing capabilities. Allowing a foreign corporation to gain significant control over this key sector poses a direct threat to U.S. national security. In an increasingly complex geopolitical environment, it is essential for the United States to maintain autonomy and control over its steel production capabilities. The loss of control over a major domestic steel producer could expose the U.S. to vulnerabilities in times of economic or political conflict.

President Donald Trump’s "Make America Great Again" policy highlighted the importance of protecting and revitalizing key industries to ensure American resilience and self-reliance. Steel production was and remains a cornerstone of this vision. Approving this acquisition would run counter to the principles of safeguarding U.S. industrial independence and could undermine efforts to rebuild and strengthen critical domestic industries.

Moreover, Nippon Steel’s acquisition of a U.S. steel company could lead to significant shifts in production priorities, technological innovation, and resource distribution that are not aligned with American strategic interests. This risk is especially pronounced given the increasing global competition and geopolitical tensions that require the United States to maintain a robust and self-sufficient industrial base.

Reason #3: Alternative Solutions for U.S. Steel Company Stakeholders

The shareholders of the U.S. steel company have several viable alternatives to achieve favorable outcomes without selling the company to Nippon Steel. These alternatives include:

1. Domestic Partnerships: The U.S. steel company could explore partnerships or joint ventures with other American companies, ensuring that control and profits remain within the U.S. economy.

2. Attracting Domestic or Foreign Investments: Investment firms or financial institutions could provide capital to support the company’s growth, modernization, and competitiveness without requiring a full acquisition.

3. Strategic Alliances: Collaborations with international partners that do not involve ceding control of the company could enable access to new technologies and markets while preserving the company’s independence.

By pursuing these alternatives, the U.S. steel company’s stakeholders could achieve their financial and strategic objectives while preserving the company’s autonomy and alignment with U.S. national interests.

Additional Considerations

The proposed acquisition raises broader concerns about the long-term implications for the U.S. steel industry. Consolidation under foreign ownership could stifle competition, limit innovation, and hinder the industry’s ability to adapt to changing market conditions. Additionally, foreign ownership of critical infrastructure and resources increases the risk of supply chain disruptions and dependencies, particularly during periods of geopolitical instability.

The United States has a proud history of industrial innovation and leadership, particularly in the steel industry. Protecting this legacy requires thoughtful policies and decisions that prioritize American interests, workers, and industries. Denying this acquisition would send a clear message that the United States remains committed to safeguarding its critical industries and national security.

Conclusion

In light of the concerns outlined above, I strongly urge the U.S. government to reject Nippon Steel’s acquisition of the U.S. steel company. This decision would protect American workers, ensure the independence and security of the U.S. steel industry, and align with the principles of economic and industrial resilience.

I appreciate your attention to this matter and your commitment to making decisions that reflect the best interests of the United States and its people. Should you require further information or input, I would be happy to provide additional insights.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Oden

Alien Puppy Hawaii.com

************************************

We Do:

Anti-CCP (the Chinese Communist Party)

Aerospace & Defense

Air Transport Service

Life Science

Blockchain & A.I.

Entertainment & Recreation

Education & Research

Public Security

************************************

2025年4月15日

件名：日米安全保障条約の見直しと再均衡の時が来ています

米国国防総省、国務省、ホワイトハウス 御中

私たちアメリカ市民および納税者は、日米安全保障関係における継続的な財政的不均衡に深い懸念を抱き、この書簡をお送りします。日本との同盟関係を重視している一方で、現行の費用分担協定は公平性、相互性、経済的現実を反映していないことは明白です。

数十年にわたり、アメリカの納税者は日本の防衛に関連する費用の不相応な割合を負担してきました。日本は経済的に豊かで、主権を持つ国家として、自国の安全保障に対してより多くの責任を果たす能力があります。これは単なる予算の問題ではなく、原則の問題です。

我々は、日本が自国の防衛に直結する在日米軍の存在に対して、相応の費用を支払うべき時が来ていると考えています。アメリカの家庭が、かつてないインフレ、財政の制約、そして国の債務の増加に直面しているこの時期において、外国政府を優遇するような協定の下で米軍が駐留を続けることは容認できません。

私たちは、日米安全保障条約の条件を早急に再評価するよう、米国の選出された代表および国家指導者に要請します。もし公平な費用分担の合意が得られないのであれば、アメリカは軍事資産の撤退および防衛資源の国内への再配置、あるいは負担を分かち合う用意のある他のパートナーへの振り替えを真剣に検討すべきです。

これは孤立主義ではありません。責任ある同盟関係の構築と維持に関する問題です。アメリカの力が海外で発揮されるとき、その代償を国内で不公平に負担することがあってはならないのです。

この重要な関係性において、公平性を回復するための行動を直ちに取っていただくことを、私たちは強く求めます。なぜなら、アメリカの防衛資源は当然のものではないからです。

敬具

AlienPuppyHawaii.com のアメリカ人一同より

April. 15th, 2025

Subject: Time to Rebalance the U.S.-Japan Security Agreement

To the U.S. Department of Defense, State Department, and the White House,

We, as American citizens and taxpayers, are writing to voice our deep concern regarding the continued financial imbalance in the U.S.-Japan security relationship. While we value our alliance with Japan, it is clear that the current cost-sharing agreement does not reflect fairness, reciprocity, or economic reality.

For decades, American taxpayers have borne a disproportionate share of the costs associated with defending Japan—a prosperous, sovereign nation fully capable of contributing more to its own security. This is no longer just a matter of budget—it’s a matter of principle.

We believe it is time for Japan to pay its fair share for the U.S. military presence that ensures its defense. In a time when U.S. families are facing record inflation, budget constraints, and growing national debt, it is unacceptable that our forces remain stationed abroad under agreements that favor foreign governments over American citizens.

We are calling on our elected officials and national leadership to urgently reassess the terms of the U.S.-Japan security agreement. If a fair cost-sharing arrangement cannot be reached, the United States must seriously consider withdrawing military assets and redirecting critical defense resources back to our homeland and to other partners who are willing to share the load.

This is not about isolationism—it's about accountability. It’s about ensuring that America’s strength abroad is not subsidized by injustice at home.

We urge you to take action and restore fairness to this vital relationship—because America’s defense resources should never be taken for granted.

Respectfully,

Your fellow Americans at

AlienPuppyHawaii.com